A few attempts at landscape

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A few attempts at landscape

Postby rokkstar on Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:06 pm

Hello all,

I thought I'd post some landscape images for C&C as I usually shy away from them due lack of pleasing results.

Image
Image
Image

Cheers
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby spartikus on Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:10 pm

not really sure what you're not pleased about! :P
great punch and colour in the second one, same contrasty feel to your landscapes as your other work!
more please!
Chris
photoblog
User avatar
spartikus
Member
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Perth, W.A. - dee-seventy

Postby pharmer on Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:30 pm

Very good shots

Nice composition on all

Taken in high midday sun? Heavy polarizer effect - Maybe even nicer if taken at dawn or dusk

Only compositon change I can suggest is remove the beach in photo 3 - looks a bit dirty/messy - pristine white sand always looks better :)
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:33 pm

Nice stuff Matt, I'd be pleased if they were mine.
Composition is good, but I'm not so keen on the colour of the water, for me the sky is almost over powering it, I'd prefer a more balanced approach (if that even makes a modicom of sense).
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby stubbsy on Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:37 pm

Matt

Seeing these I can see why you shy away from them. NOT

Image #1 is a cracker. Brilliantly strong leading lines and that gorgeous aquamarine water that looks like it's straight out of a TV commercial. If I was to nit pick (and they're tiny nits) I have a problem with that big white cloud in top left which unbalances the image with its dominance. And I'd like nature to take away those ugly brown/green blemishes in the water

#2 - well to be honest I'm still blown away by #1, but getting back to #2 this doesn't work for me. The sky is great, but the foreground interest isn't there. I flick between the large boat on the RHS and the tiny one on the LHS. Compositionally I'd have ignored rule of turds on this and chosen neat and in the middle.

#3 - almost as strong compositionally as #1, but I'd like some foreground interest (a couple strolling along, a child making sandcastles, some beach umbrellas) to anchor the middle of the shot. That said, I think this is a very striking image and I'm being hypercritical

All in all I'd say your great photographic skills are well in evidence here and these are no argument for shying away from landscapes.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby blacknstormy on Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:16 am

Bloody hell (to take a line out of our new tourism advertising campaign :) ), what are you complaining about man!!!! They are great photos - I love #1 - feel like I'm standing on the jetty on the way out to the end.

more please :)

Rel
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby wendellt on Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:27 am

probably the last one is most interesting becasue the dramatic clouds compliment the aangle of the walkway

each picture has a secondary subject element liek in pic 2 the boat, usually when i compose there is a main subject and just to make the image more dimensional a secondary subject, but i only take shots of spannign simple scenes with these two elements, that's a trick to create interest and visual interplay, beign a designer yourself i am sure you are familiar with it

in your images there is too much goign on in the background for your main and secondary subjects to work effectively they look 1:1

to create a dramatic landscape doesn't necassarily mean getting everything in, sometimes you have to frame thoughtfully to get less in

for example i have a 12mm lens sometimes when i take a wide shot i get heaps of elements in that doesn't make for a great landscape
i usually shoot at 24mm framign only the most interestign bits of a landscape

anyway my thoughts only
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby rokkstar on Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:38 pm

THank you very much for the kind comments guys.
I still feel im not very good at them, and strike lucky sometimes - this being one of them.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby owen on Fri Feb 24, 2006 7:37 pm

Hi Matt. I love the last one, that shot is great. I think the sand provides enough of an interest in the foreground otherwise anything more would compete with the awesome structure in the clouds. Lovely colours both in the sky and the water. Mind if I ask where these were taken?

Cheers,
Owen.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby dooda on Fri Feb 24, 2006 7:50 pm

They're all taken from a sort of standing viewpoint. Try crouching sometimes and pointing upwards, or get in closer to some of the foreground elements. THe blue is way too strong for me in all of these.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby macka on Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:02 pm

I think the first one is fantastic, but I would perhaps have gotten down lower for it.

macka
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby Finch on Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:47 pm

Matt

No.1 for me, too. This shot really draws you into the scene. Great colours and nice use of wide-angled lens.

If this isn't your usual 'thing', it should be!

Nice work

Cheers

Michael
User avatar
Finch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: Keperra, Brisbane

Postby mudder on Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:49 pm

G'day,

Don't shy away anymore, these are really good... All have stunning color, assuming a polariser was used?

#1, Great lines, tempted to get lower so the left railing is more of the subject and higher in the frame, horizon same level but the rails higher (if you know what I mean doh :oops: ), hmmm might be tempted to darken the top 1/3 of the sky with a gradient (overlay blend mode) it'd even up the darker blue area too, would also lessen the highlight on an edge of a frame... Terrific lines and shadows in the water...

#2, terrific sky! Needs something more in the foreground/middleground though, but not sure what... sorry :oops:

#3, This is another good'n. something about the sand is distracting my eye though, try cropping the sand out from the bottom and just past the second pair of pylons of the pier on the right, see what you reckon...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby rokkstar on Sun Feb 26, 2006 1:41 pm

owen wrote:Mind if I ask where these were taken?


Owen, these were taken at Sorrento near Melbourne.

Thank you for the constructive critique guys, really appreciate it. I'll add a final one into this thread from the same shoot. This is another side of the same pier, but I went for a lower perspective and as I was shooting more into the sun the polariser effect wasn't as strong.

Image

Cheers
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby sydneywebcam on Sun Feb 26, 2006 2:52 pm

Number one is my favourite from the trio. Just love that long jetty stretching out to the horizon with the clouds mirroring it.

With number two the sky is starting to look a little unnatural for me with the high saturation.

I feel number three would be perfect with a crop to the water line so that the jetty starts in the right hand corner.

Great work.
________________
Cheers,
Paul.
Last edited by sydneywebcam on Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
sydneywebcam
Member
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:55 am
Location: Pennant Hills, Sydney

Postby MATT on Sun Feb 26, 2006 2:59 pm

Got to say , Number 2..

Fantastic colours.

I would also like to see No.3 cropped with no sand.

Thansk for sharing these

MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques