Some Waterbirds From This Morning

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Some Waterbirds From This Morning

Postby NikonUser on Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:38 am

Hi there,

I was going to go out for a sunrise this morning but slept in... :oops: So I thought I'd go down to Mornington to get some practice in with the long lens. I haven't had much time to PP these so I might post some more later with some adjustments but here is a quick grab.

These are my first ever attempts at Waterbirds. Comments and Critiques welcome :)

All taken with D70, 500 f4, 1.4x TC, SB800, Better Beamer
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com

Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
User avatar
NikonUser
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Canberra - **D2X**

Postby avkomp on Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:13 pm

the 4th is my favourite, you have the whites spot-on, the oof stuff in the background doesnt distract from the foreground subject.

5th is good also.

first would be great with the colour of the rocks etc but the OOF bird behind
masks the main subject a bit.

steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Pa on Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:13 pm

they are all nice shots my fav is the fifth.
cheers pa
User avatar
Pa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: old bar, NSW 2430

Postby mudder on Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:12 pm

I have no idea about birding, but I reckon I'd struggle with exposure on black and white birds like this so I reckon you've done well there...

Particularly enjoyed the last couple, they just seem to grab me more, wonder if it's the eye detail? Last one would be my favorite of the bunch...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby NikonUser on Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:45 pm

Thanks for the replies guys.

I don't know if it's possible to get better 'eye contact' with these terns as they have black eyes surrounded by black feathers.

Here's another one that is about as good as I could get the eye detail. Is this a little better?

Image

Paul
http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com

Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
User avatar
NikonUser
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Canberra - **D2X**

Postby mudder on Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:53 pm

Mate,

Black eyes surrounded by black feathers, strewth, that's an uphill battle... :lol: You've done a LOT better than I would have...

That last one you've just posted is a pearler! Seems beautifully exposed, nice and sharp and terrific isolation of your subject from the background... Works a treat :)
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby avkomp on Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:57 pm

paul, the additional image is nicer than the other terns.

perhaps the lower camera angle, definitely a better background.
I think the eye contact is important unless of course there is something else going on which is dramatic enough not to need it.

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby NikonUser on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:01 pm

avkomp wrote:paul, the additional image is nicer than the other terns.

perhaps the lower camera angle, definitely a better background.
I think the eye contact is important unless of course there is something else going on which is dramatic enough not to need it.

Steve


Lower camera angle :shock: I was already in enough pain with the rocks jabbing into every part of my body :) It certainly wasn't a nice sandy patch of beach!!!

I know eye contact is one of the most important things... Would you say the dark eyes on the last shot means there is no eye contact?

Paul
http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com

Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
User avatar
NikonUser
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Canberra - **D2X**

Postby avkomp on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:04 pm

the last one works well
If you wanted you could brighen the eye up a little with shadow highlight on the eye area only.

last one looks a different lens also,
500f4?? just looks less DOF which makes it stand out more.

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby NikonUser on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:06 pm

Same lens, 500f4 + 1.4x TC (same on all shots)

What makes you say it looks different?

Will try the shadow highlights on the eye. Have had trouble with that in the past making it looked washed out though.

Paul
http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com

Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
User avatar
NikonUser
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Canberra - **D2X**

Postby Matt. K on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:12 pm

Good work. You have some nice images here and the 500mm lens is certainly earning its bread and butter.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby avkomp on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:12 pm

was just the dof seemed shallower.

As for the eye, assuming photoshop, I would select the eye area with the oval select tool, feather the selection (5pixels, I believe) then slight shadow highlight nowhere near 50%. 10%? maybe.

Still looks ok though.

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby blacknstormy on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:15 pm

Wow, 500 and the TC!!! Great crisp shots.
Love the last one in the first series, and that single you posted - top stuff.
Rel
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby mudder on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:23 pm

NikonUser wrote:...Lower camera angle :shock: I was already in enough pain with the rocks jabbing into every part of my body :) It certainly wasn't a nice sandy patch of beach!!!


Ahhhh, dedication to the cause, good stuff... :lol:

NikonUser wrote:... I know eye contact is one of the most important things... Would you say the dark eyes on the last shot means there is no eye contact?...


Not necessarily eye contact (you'd be doing pretty well to get eye contact with a bird many many meters away), I think so long as the viewer can make out the eye itself, I reckon it gives the image a hook for the viewer to catch...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Finch on Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:33 pm

Paul,

4th and 5th in the first set are by far my favourites. Also love the extra one you posted of the tern. Very sharp, great DOF and the most imortant thing (in my opinion) is that the eyes are in focus.

Also good to see that you have had to 'work' for the last pic you posted, by crawling on your belly and being jabbed by rocks. Have done that so many times and if you get a corker of a shot, its worth it every bit.

Well done

Cheers

Michael
User avatar
Finch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: Keperra, Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques