I was going to go out for a sunrise this morning but slept in...

These are my first ever attempts at Waterbirds. Comments and Critiques welcome

All taken with D70, 500 f4, 1.4x TC, SB800, Better Beamer





Some Waterbirds From This MorningModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some Waterbirds From This MorningHi there,
I was going to go out for a sunrise this morning but slept in... ![]() These are my first ever attempts at Waterbirds. Comments and Critiques welcome ![]() All taken with D70, 500 f4, 1.4x TC, SB800, Better Beamer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
the 4th is my favourite, you have the whites spot-on, the oof stuff in the background doesnt distract from the foreground subject.
5th is good also. first would be great with the colour of the rocks etc but the OOF bird behind masks the main subject a bit. steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
I have no idea about birding, but I reckon I'd struggle with exposure on black and white birds like this so I reckon you've done well there...
Particularly enjoyed the last couple, they just seem to grab me more, wonder if it's the eye detail? Last one would be my favorite of the bunch... Aka Andrew
Thanks for the replies guys.
I don't know if it's possible to get better 'eye contact' with these terns as they have black eyes surrounded by black feathers. Here's another one that is about as good as I could get the eye detail. Is this a little better? ![]() Paul http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
Mate,
Black eyes surrounded by black feathers, strewth, that's an uphill battle... ![]() That last one you've just posted is a pearler! Seems beautifully exposed, nice and sharp and terrific isolation of your subject from the background... Works a treat ![]() Aka Andrew
paul, the additional image is nicer than the other terns.
perhaps the lower camera angle, definitely a better background. I think the eye contact is important unless of course there is something else going on which is dramatic enough not to need it. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Lower camera angle ![]() ![]() I know eye contact is one of the most important things... Would you say the dark eyes on the last shot means there is no eye contact? Paul http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
the last one works well
If you wanted you could brighen the eye up a little with shadow highlight on the eye area only. last one looks a different lens also, 500f4?? just looks less DOF which makes it stand out more. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Same lens, 500f4 + 1.4x TC (same on all shots)
What makes you say it looks different? Will try the shadow highlights on the eye. Have had trouble with that in the past making it looked washed out though. Paul http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
was just the dof seemed shallower.
As for the eye, assuming photoshop, I would select the eye area with the oval select tool, feather the selection (5pixels, I believe) then slight shadow highlight nowhere near 50%. 10%? maybe. Still looks ok though. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Wow, 500 and the TC!!! Great crisp shots.
Love the last one in the first series, and that single you posted - top stuff. Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Ahhhh, dedication to the cause, good stuff... ![]()
Not necessarily eye contact (you'd be doing pretty well to get eye contact with a bird many many meters away), I think so long as the viewer can make out the eye itself, I reckon it gives the image a hook for the viewer to catch... Aka Andrew
Paul,
4th and 5th in the first set are by far my favourites. Also love the extra one you posted of the tern. Very sharp, great DOF and the most imortant thing (in my opinion) is that the eyes are in focus. Also good to see that you have had to 'work' for the last pic you posted, by crawling on your belly and being jabbed by rocks. Have done that so many times and if you get a corker of a shot, its worth it every bit. Well done Cheers Michael
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|