
Dock at DuskModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
23 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Dock at DuskTaken at Pier 35, Port Melbourne this evening
![]()
Beautifully crafted image Barrie. You have used the glorious afternoon/morning light to great effect with the whole scene punctuated with the terrific cloud formations. The whole scene sits well together.
cheers marco
Brilliant Barrie. Love it. Postcard material
![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
You need to stop posting images like this, they're causing severe lust for wide angle lenses
![]() Simply fantastic shot, gorgeous colours in the sky and afternoon light, and great use of the wide angle ![]() So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
Ahh.. wide angle
![]() I just mentioned it in another thread, but this is my favourite photo-taking time... though perhaps a bit later than the other thread. This one is that magic 15 minutes every day - normally the 15 minutes when I am anywhere but somewhere where my camera is ![]() Nicely done!! Beautifully timed too, the colours and reflections are perfect. I might have exposed the sky a bit darker, but otherwise it is all good!!
Sigma 10-20 @ 10mm Exposure Time: 1/40 sec F-Number: f/5.6 Exposure Program: Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating: 320 Lens Aperture: f/5.6 Exposure Bias: 0.3 EV Metering Mode: Pattern Light Source: Cloudy Weather Flash: No Flash Focal Length: 10.00 mm White Balance: Manual Scene Capture Type: Standard Gain Control: None Contrast: Normal Saturation: High Sharpness: Hard
Thanks. very nice. ![]()
Barrie
I wasn't a big fan of the first shot, but the palm tree is superb. Great contrast in colour and tone between the orange/brown rough tree and the blue/grey fluffy clouds. Strong composition too. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
i love the mellow colors and how they mix with the orange glow of the sun! well done!
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
Thanks Peter - any reason for not liking the first? I would like some criticism ![]() Its all helpful
my Sony, Barrie. A couple of reasons the first image doesn't quite work for me I find the distortion a bit distracting because it draws my eye very strongly to the rock wall and path in the lower right foreground, but the interest in the pic is elsewhere. This could be fixed by a pano crop just below the base of the bollard on the LHS The whole image has a blue cast - the sky is too blue as are the presumably white hulls of the boat - I'd dial down the blue a touch, maybe even push the red slightly to warm the whole image. This would in turn give a nice sunset glow to the whole image. EDIT: I'd also reduce the saturation slightly. Of course YMMV ![]() Last edited by stubbsy on Fri May 05, 2006 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Barrie, I'd echo Peter's thoughts on your first shot, especially retifying the colour cast which is making for a fairly dull exposure. Whilst it would be worthwhile to play around with the composition with some cropping as Peter has suggested, my feeling is that the scene as a whole lacks any real focal interest... I'm really not sure what the subject or point of the picture is... just a snap of a location to me.
Bottom line for me is that you can do and have done better work IMHO.
That's better Barrie, although it now seems to have a slight yellow cast (too much blue reduction?)
Here's my take. Hope you don't mind. It's quick & dirty using Fireworks (no Photoshop @ work) and a touch too pink. ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter, its so subjective isn't it?- I like the yellow cast ![]() Your take is almost as cold as my original, but pinker I'd have to leave it and say I'm happy with both of mine ![]()
Barrie - at the end of the day it's your image and the best treatment is what works for you. So far as my take, I agree I did a bad job of it - want me to remove my version? Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Only if you want to ![]() Leave it there for future thread readers - its educational ![]() Cheers
Barrie, forgot to mention - I think the second version by you is a marked imrpovement - especially the recrop.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
23 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|