




Dan
Never have i done this before!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Never have i done this before!Truth be know i don't even like kids (i mean that in a nice way of course). They smell, make strange noises, and have all sorts of gooey stuff coming out of every orifice
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Dan
I'm not sure about this case, but that can be intentional with this style (also notice the blues are waaay over the top).
Friendly bump
![]() I need advice on these.....as i havent done this type of thing before? I have intentionaly upped the blues and the contrast. Cheers Thanks for the comments so far! Dan
Dan - I don't think there's really anything 'wrong' with these images. What it comes down to really is how the client reacts when they see them. I'm not a huge fan of the excessive blues but it is indeed a 'style'. I think some more intimate shots would have been good, some real closes ups and perhaps some more candids. When I do a family shoot with young kids I make a real effort to make it fun. I ask the kids that we'll do some photos sitting down, then allow them to 'run around' for a bit (when I try to get some candids) then pull them in again for a few more formals if possible. Working with kids is indeed achallenge but the reactions and beautiful smiles you can get is worth the 'hard' work. A technique that often works well with families or kids alone is to get them to walk/run towards you, often the enthusiasm of the littles ones running their legs off towards you can achieve again, some great shots. Do you have any more you can show us from this shoot?
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
I don't mind excessive blues, but I find these too harsh on the contrast, especially for colour where there isn't a high degree of Bokeh (isn't really any Bokeh at all).
Numbers 1 and 2 seem to be the best done on it, but you cropped the foot on number 2!!! Leave a bit more space to really make the kid stand in the ground. I'd say number 4 just pushes it too far. It's bordered on blowing out and it feels almost as if it's over-sharpened as a result and not that brilliant PP work, no offense. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Great shots Rach /Dan
![]() I think you have got the just jeans look .The last three look fantastic and i imagine will look good printed .Can't put my finger on it but the first one is missing something .I like the idea though . Tony
Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
Dan,
Yes, I think that you've taken #4 too far - not just the contrast, highlights and stuff, but I suspect it's oversharpened as well. Basically, they're good and very vibrant though. Not sure about the pushing of the blue; my gut feeling is that the white dress should be white, rather than the pale blue it currently seems to be, but you've stated that you're pushing this in that direction, so please take that on advisement. The clincher here would be what does the client want to see: a white, or a blue, dress. Answer that question, and you'll know how far you want to push this. ![]() g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Yes mate here are some more traditional ones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Cheers Dan
Dan,
#s 1 and four ... you need to cut back just a tad on your sharpening - these seem to be oversharpened. And you say that these are more traditional; in that statement are you also saying that you're not looking at pushing the blue colouration here? Please take what I'm saying here within the context of that - both sets, even with your statement that you're pushing for a blue tinge, look to me to have too much of this blue to them. In #s 3 and 4 from this most recent set, the girl's dress which I suspect should be white, simply is not. This was evident too in the earlier set of images. As a parent, I think I'd be looking for something a tad more true to life from prtraits of my kids. Taking that to the next level, my kids' grandparents - which I think might be reasonable expected point od sales for these images - would simply not understand what you're doing with these: a white dress (or shirt) ... should be white, not blue. So .... while you may be satisfying your creative urge in doint what you're doing, from a commercial PoV perhaps it might be wise to consider your market for these images. And perhaps you already have, and this is the result; I don't know, but I do know people, and - unlike you - I am a parent. Cheers. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
I should have explained also that my "brief" was for "something different and unusual from normal Portstyle images" ......Yeah thanks Gary - more one and four i suppose i meant - just one point on the sharpening, that is just these resized images for the web that are sharpened (its an action in CS3). I do not sharpen at all my large print versions (D200 is as sharp as a tack with Pro lenses on it). So yeah.....i will look at cutting back on the blue cast! Invaluable advice! Dan
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|