Never have i done this before!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Never have i done this before!

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:28 pm

Truth be know i don't even like kids (i mean that in a nice way of course). They smell, make strange noises, and have all sorts of gooey stuff coming out of every orifice :lol: (can ya tell I don’t have any) But I tried my hand at a paid “family” shoot today…..here are some early favs. I wanted the images to look like those of a Just Jeans commercial/catalogue. Please C&C needed……cheers

Image
Image
Image
Image

Dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Paul on Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:38 pm

Number 3 is such a classic!
Frame it and sell it :D
Nikon F80D, FM2n
RRS BH-55, 055XPROB
Smugmug
User avatar
Paul
Senior Member
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia

Postby admajic on Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:47 pm

I like the shots. Just seems you have blown all the highlights in the water and on the white shirts....
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
User avatar
admajic
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction

Postby DaveB on Fri Mar 02, 2007 11:30 pm

admajic wrote:Just seems you have blown all the highlights in the water and on the white shirts....

I'm not sure about this case, but that can be intentional with this style (also notice the blues are waaay over the top).
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:34 am

Friendly bump :D

I need advice on these.....as i havent done this type of thing before?

I have intentionaly upped the blues and the contrast.

Cheers

Thanks for the comments so far!

Dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Geoff on Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:27 pm

Dan - I don't think there's really anything 'wrong' with these images. What it comes down to really is how the client reacts when they see them. I'm not a huge fan of the excessive blues but it is indeed a 'style'. I think some more intimate shots would have been good, some real closes ups and perhaps some more candids. When I do a family shoot with young kids I make a real effort to make it fun. I ask the kids that we'll do some photos sitting down, then allow them to 'run around' for a bit (when I try to get some candids) then pull them in again for a few more formals if possible. Working with kids is indeed achallenge but the reactions and beautiful smiles you can get is worth the 'hard' work. A technique that often works well with families or kids alone is to get them to walk/run towards you, often the enthusiasm of the littles ones running their legs off towards you can achieve again, some great shots. Do you have any more you can show us from this shoot?
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Nnnnsic on Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:31 pm

I don't mind excessive blues, but I find these too harsh on the contrast, especially for colour where there isn't a high degree of Bokeh (isn't really any Bokeh at all).

Numbers 1 and 2 seem to be the best done on it, but you cropped the foot on number 2!!! Leave a bit more space to really make the kid stand in the ground.

I'd say number 4 just pushes it too far. It's bordered on blowing out and it feels almost as if it's over-sharpened as a result and not that brilliant PP work, no offense.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby drifter on Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:42 pm

Great shots Rach /Dan ;)

I think you have got the just jeans look .The last three look fantastic and i imagine will look good printed .Can't put my finger on it but the first one is missing something .I like the idea though .
Tony

Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
User avatar
drifter
Member
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:37 pm
Location: Croydon -Sydney

Postby gstark on Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:13 pm

Dan,

Yes, I think that you've taken #4 too far - not just the contrast, highlights and stuff, but I suspect it's oversharpened as well.

Basically, they're good and very vibrant though. Not sure about the pushing of the blue; my gut feeling is that the white dress should be white, rather than the pale blue it currently seems to be, but you've stated that you're pushing this in that direction, so please take that on advisement.

The clincher here would be what does the client want to see: a white, or a blue, dress. Answer that question, and you'll know how far you want to push this. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:31 pm

Thanks guys.....very welcome help!

Dan

:D
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:02 am

Geoff wrote:Dan - I don't think there's really anything 'wrong' with these images. What it comes down to really is how the client reacts when they see them. I'm not a huge fan of the excessive blues but it is indeed a 'style'. I think some more intimate shots would have been good, some real closes ups and perhaps some more candids. When I do a family shoot with young kids I make a real effort to make it fun. I ask the kids that we'll do some photos sitting down, then allow them to 'run around' for a bit (when I try to get some candids) then pull them in again for a few more formals if possible. Working with kids is indeed achallenge but the reactions and beautiful smiles you can get is worth the 'hard' work. A technique that often works well with families or kids alone is to get them to walk/run towards you, often the enthusiasm of the littles ones running their legs off towards you can achieve again, some great shots. Do you have any more you can show us from this shoot?


Yes mate here are some more traditional ones

Image
Image
Image
Image

Cheers
Dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby gstark on Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:20 am

Dan,

#s 1 and four ... you need to cut back just a tad on your sharpening - these seem to be oversharpened.

And you say that these are more traditional; in that statement are you also saying that you're not looking at pushing the blue colouration here?

Please take what I'm saying here within the context of that - both sets, even with your statement that you're pushing for a blue tinge, look to me to have too much of this blue to them.

In #s 3 and 4 from this most recent set, the girl's dress which I suspect should be white, simply is not. This was evident too in the earlier set of images.

As a parent, I think I'd be looking for something a tad more true to life from prtraits of my kids. Taking that to the next level, my kids' grandparents - which I think might be reasonable expected point od sales for these images - would simply not understand what you're doing with these: a white dress (or shirt) ... should be white, not blue.

So .... while you may be satisfying your creative urge in doint what you're doing, from a commercial PoV perhaps it might be wise to consider your market for these images.

And perhaps you already have, and this is the result; I don't know, but I do know people, and - unlike you - I am a parent.

Cheers.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:34 am

gstark wrote:Dan,

#s 1 and four ... you need to cut back just a tad on your sharpening - these seem to be oversharpened.

And you say that these are more traditional; in that statement are you also saying that you're not looking at pushing the blue colouration here?

Please take what I'm saying here within the context of that - both sets, even with your statement that you're pushing for a blue tinge, look to me to have too much of this blue to them.

In #s 3 and 4 from this most recent set, the girl's dress which I suspect should be white, simply is not. This was evident too in the earlier set of images.

As a parent, I think I'd be looking for something a tad more true to life from prtraits of my kids. Taking that to the next level, my kids' grandparents - which I think might be reasonable expected point od sales for these images - would simply not understand what you're doing with these: a white dress (or shirt) ... should be white, not blue.

So .... while you may be satisfying your creative urge in doint what you're doing, from a commercial PoV perhaps it might be wise to consider your market for these images.

And perhaps you already have, and this is the result; I don't know, but I do know people, and - unlike you - I am a parent.

Cheers.


I should have explained also that my "brief" was for "something different and unusual from normal Portstyle images" ......Yeah thanks Gary - more one and four i suppose i meant - just one point on the sharpening, that is just these resized images for the web that are sharpened (its an action in CS3). I do not sharpen at all my large print versions (D200 is as sharp as a tack with Pro lenses on it).

So yeah.....i will look at cutting back on the blue cast!

Invaluable advice!

Dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques