
Hoot HootModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Hoot HootCraig has been hassling me to photo atleast one of the photos I took at the Zoo on the weekend, so here it is. It's a Rufus Owl, named Angus, and he landed very close to me, so I got this shot which I'm rather happy with.
![]()
Great shot Katie. Craig is right to have pushed you to post this. Now push him to give you a lens with better bokeh than this one.
![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Oooh, she bought me the lens for our Europe.. but for its versatility your aren't going to get the bokeh of the 70-200 or the 80-200 from the 18-200VR
![]()
Katie - friggen unreal. Bokeh is the beautiful and often OOF background that is seen in an image with a shallow DOF (lower number F stop). It often creates little 'lights' which represent the shape of the elements in the glass/lens u are using. It is often the bokeh that really helps 'make' the image, but way of contrast to the usually sharp in focus portion of the image. You've done this brilliantly! That's my description and it's not that good, but this is the Wikipedia one:
Last edited by Geoff on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Thanks for the explanation Geoff - i didnt even realise that the bridge etc would be in the background until we got home. I was sitting at the back with my mum and Craig had left the D70 with me, the bird handler got it to fly to her right infront of me so i thoguht i should get a photo or Craig might be mad!!!!
![]() so Stubbsy am i meant to aim to get "good Bokeh"???
Katie. Pretty much what's already been said. Bokeh is a function of the lens. If you look at this image the bokeh is a little "harsh" - note how the bright lights in the background are kinda like donuts or buttons with well defined edges. Using a lens which rendered this same scene with better bokeh you'd see a smoother, softer background where those bright bits lacked the hard edges and blended more into the background. All this aside - don't take my comment to mean there's anything wrong with the image - it's a great capture. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
An excellent and unusual photo all round. Very unusual "bokeh", which to my way of thinking is a very subjective topic.
![]() President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Nice shot KG...
Focus on the bird is perfect, and the background set's it off nicely and gives a real sense of place. There's been more talk of bokeh than I think I've ever seen, but why not some more... While it is harsher than many lenses I think it works. Too much softer and you'd lose some of the definition of the bridge etc that make this shot. Of course we'll never know unless you go back, get the bird back into position and shoot it with another lens!!
A great shot Katie. He really is a cool dude of a bird. I thought it was a Black Kite but the popular concensus appears to be a Rufus Owl.
The bird show is really great. I'd recommend it to all. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Thanks John
this guy was the Rufus Owl named Angus - he was the only one to fly onto the "junior bird keepers" hand ( they picked a girl out of the audience and the real keeper held her hand and Angus flew over)- he is a baby still but very large.
John - http://www.zoo.nsw.gov.au/content/view.asp?id=1075
Is helpful if you need to idea which bird was which, they were coming thick and fast and seeing it twice but slightly different is also confusing. This guy is definitely Angus the Rufus Owl.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|