Hoot Hoot

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Hoot Hoot

Postby Katie G on Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:58 am

Craig has been hassling me to photo atleast one of the photos I took at the Zoo on the weekend, so here it is. It's a Rufus Owl, named Angus, and he landed very close to me, so I got this shot which I'm rather happy with.

Image
User avatar
Katie G
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney

Postby Glen on Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:00 am

Great detail Katie, I feel like I can tell what colour of mascara is being used
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby stubbsy on Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:23 am

Great shot Katie. Craig is right to have pushed you to post this. Now push him to give you a lens with better bokeh than this one. :wink:
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Katie G on Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:27 am

thanks guys :D

what is "bokeh"?
User avatar
Katie G
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:28 am

Oooh, she bought me the lens for our Europe.. but for its versatility your aren't going to get the bokeh of the 70-200 or the 80-200 from the 18-200VR :)
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Geoff on Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:32 am

Katie - friggen unreal. Bokeh is the beautiful and often OOF background that is seen in an image with a shallow DOF (lower number F stop). It often creates little 'lights' which represent the shape of the elements in the glass/lens u are using. It is often the bokeh that really helps 'make' the image, but way of contrast to the usually sharp in focus portion of the image. You've done this brilliantly! That's my description and it's not that good, but this is the Wikipedia one:

Japanese boke (ぼけ), "blur"[1]) is a photographic term referring to out-of-focus (OOF) areas in a photographic image. While this is an aggregate phenomenon and no evidence of formal definition, quantitative, or qualitative framework has been provided, some continue to link this vague, subjectively described quality to various lenses where no obvious consistent link has been demonstrated (see for example [1]). Unfocused background or foreground is both an inevitability in many photographic situations, and a frequently-used artistic device [2], for example as an attempt to reduce distractions, and emphasise the subject.
Last edited by Geoff on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Katie G on Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:36 am

Thanks for the explanation Geoff - i didnt even realise that the bridge etc would be in the background until we got home. I was sitting at the back with my mum and Craig had left the D70 with me, the bird handler got it to fly to her right infront of me so i thoguht i should get a photo or Craig might be mad!!!!
:shock:

so Stubbsy am i meant to aim to get "good Bokeh"???
User avatar
Katie G
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney

Postby Glen on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:33 pm

Katie bokeh is more a function of the lens and using shallow depth of field than aiming to get it. Some lenses are known for it, such as the 85 1.4 or 70-200 other are not such as 500/8 reflex.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby stubbsy on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:51 pm

Katie G wrote:so Stubbsy am i meant to aim to get "good Bokeh"???


Katie. Pretty much what's already been said. Bokeh is a function of the lens. If you look at this image the bokeh is a little "harsh" - note how the bright lights in the background are kinda like donuts or buttons with well defined edges. Using a lens which rendered this same scene with better bokeh you'd see a smoother, softer background where those bright bits lacked the hard edges and blended more into the background.

All this aside - don't take my comment to mean there's anything wrong with the image - it's a great capture.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby ozimax on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:55 pm

An excellent and unusual photo all round. Very unusual "bokeh", which to my way of thinking is a very subjective topic. :D
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby dawesy on Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:34 pm

Nice shot KG...

Focus on the bird is perfect, and the background set's it off nicely and gives a real sense of place.

There's been more talk of bokeh than I think I've ever seen, but why not some more... While it is harsher than many lenses I think it works. Too much softer and you'd lose some of the definition of the bridge etc that make this shot. Of course we'll never know unless you go back, get the bird back into position and shoot it with another lens!!
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney

Postby johnd on Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:47 pm

A great shot Katie. He really is a cool dude of a bird. I thought it was a Black Kite but the popular concensus appears to be a Rufus Owl.

The bird show is really great. I'd recommend it to all.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Katie G on Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:55 pm

Thanks John

this guy was the Rufus Owl named Angus - he was the only one to fly onto the "junior bird keepers" hand ( they picked a girl out of the audience and the real keeper held her hand and Angus flew over)- he is a baby still but very large.
User avatar
Katie G
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:55 pm

John - http://www.zoo.nsw.gov.au/content/view.asp?id=1075
Is helpful if you need to idea which bird was which, they were coming thick and fast and seeing it twice but slightly different is also confusing. This guy is definitely Angus the Rufus Owl.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Wed Mar 14, 2007 5:19 pm

Sharp as a tack......wow.great shot!
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Oscar on Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:16 pm

Nice shot Katie. Well done.

Perhaps you should also have Craig get you a D200 along with the 70-200VR - imagine how your shots could look then 8)

Cheers, Mick :) :) :)
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:38 pm

Peter
Very astute observation re the bokeh. Lenses do matter.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques