


300 f/2.8 MacrosModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
300 f/2.8 MacrosFinch and I ran our Brissie Wildlife workshop last weekend and I loaned my Sigma 180 Macro to one of the participants. Good opportunity to experiment so out with the Nikkor 300 f/2.8 and Triplus extension tubes
![]() ![]() ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Probably the most expensive macro I've seen
![]() Great photos, especially the frog, cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Excellent.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Hi Mark
Great shots using a non-conventional "macro" lens but they sure do work. It was a fun day, participant's learned heaps and some great photos were achieved by all. Excellent stuff! Cheers
Great results with your unconventional macro lens Slider. I've used my 180mm f/2.8 with extension rings before, and been pleased with the result. Sure, the DOF isn't very large, but the greater working distance is very useful for subjects such as butterflies, which can sometimes be hard to get close enough to, without causing them to fly off, with conventional macro lenses of relatively short FL.
Gordon D70, D200, CP5700
Thanks for the comments folks
![]()
Gordon, I normally use a Sigma 180 f/3.5 Macro which I love due to the greater working distance but this was ridiculous. Here is a shot of the workshop group and I was behind them to get the frog and lizard with the 300 f/2.8 ![]() ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
![]() ![]() ![]() don't you like Slider's photo ![]() everyone is so very serious about taking THEE photo of the frog or lizard. (voyeurs should I add ? ![]() I think that photo is very illustrating and funny. Regards, CD
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
i've use the 300 on dragonflies before with pretty good results
![]() Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
love the colours in #1, nice photo.
what sort of magnification would you get with this lens and all the ext tubes you used?
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|